XLMUSDT is trading at $0.17, positioned between support at $0.16–$0.15 and resistance at $0.18–$0.20, in a RISK OFF broader environment with bearish alt breadth and bearish stablecoin pressure.
1. Macro & Sentiment Overview
- Regime: RISK OFF (Score -0.80), Strategy flag: HOLD
- Alt Breadth (AB): BEAR, Value -1.07
- Stablecoin Pressure (SPI): BEAR, Value 1.23
- Leverage Pressure (LPI): MODERATE SHORT LEVERAGE, Value -0.77
- OI Delta (OID): MODERATEBEARISHLVL_-1, Value -0.49
- FOP Index: PRICE LED BEARISH, Value -0.23 (Price -1.71%, OI +0.29%, Fund -3.08)
- Dominance Price Conflict (DPC): NEUTRAL (-0.09)
- Crypto Equity Weight (CEW): CORRELATED (1.00) – full alignment with equity-style behavior in this metric.
- Broader crypto: TOTAL 1 -1.29%, TOTAL 2 -1.27%, TOTAL 3 -1.76%, BTC -1.78%, ETH +0.03%.
- VIX: 20.29, strong_up (+20.29%) – elevated volatility backdrop.
2. Price Structure, Levels, and Trend
Key Levels
-
Support & Resistance:
Level Price R3 $0.20 R2 $0.19 R1 $0.18 S1 $0.16 S2 $0.15 S3 $0.14 -
Volume Profile (4H):
- POC: $0.16
- HVN: $0.15
- LVN: $0.16
- VAH: $0.17
- VAL: $0.15
-
Naked POCs (4H): $0.19, $0.18, $0.15
- Volume Profile (1D): POC/HVN/VAL at $0.15, VAH $0.24, LVN $0.22
- NPOC (1D): None active.
Trend
- 4H Trend: Uptrend (HH + HL), last swing top $0.17, bottom $0.15.
- 1D Trend: Downtrend (LH + LL), last top $0.19, bottom $0.15.
- Fibonacci (4H): 61.8–50% at $0.17, 100% at $0.19, 0% at $0.15.
- Fibonacci (1D): 23.6% at $0.16, 38.2% at $0.18, 100% at $0.26, 0% at $0.14.
Volatility & Patterns
- TTM Squeeze (1h): active – hourly volatility compression.
- Weekly Candlestick: Liqgrab Bull at $0.16, 2 bars ago.
- 4H CHOP: 60.48 (up +52.97%) – choppier conditions.
- 1D CHOP: 49.89 – mid-range.
- 4H HV/HV%: 34.67 / 77.55, slightly lower.
- 1D HV/HV%: 99.51 / 83.47, high and stable.
3. Momentum, EMAs, and Oscillators
Oscillator Scanner
| TF | RSI | Stoch | MFI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1h | 47.1 | 46.2 | 56.3 |
| 4h | 48.9 | 22.0 | 25.7 |
| 1d | 43.2 | 67.7 | 52.6 |
| 1w | 31.7 | 19.4 | 36.3 |
Values cluster around neutral to lower ranges, especially on the weekly timeframe.
EMAs & Trend Quality
-
4H EMA Price Distance:
EMA Level Price vs EMA 8 $0.17 -0.35% 20 $0.17 -0.66% 50 $0.17 +0.12% 200 $0.18 -9.21% - Trend label: Bullish (20 > 50)
- Macro: Bearish (50 < 200)
-
1D EMA Price Distance:
EMA Level Price vs EMA 8 $0.17 +0.01% 20 $0.17 -4.10% 50 $0.20 -14.61% 200 $0.26 -35.57% - Trend label: Bearish (20 < 50)
- Macro: Bearish (50 < 200)
Short-term EMAs cluster around price, while longer EMAs on daily remain well above, consistent with a longer-term downtrend.
4. Orderflow, CVD, Derivatives, and BTC Correlation
BTC Correlation (4H)
- Correlation: 0.80
- Beta: 1.30
- Expected Move: 0.77%
- Actual vs Expected: -0.17%
- Lag Signal: NEE
- Catch-up Probability (metric): 100.0%
XLM is strongly correlated with BTC on 4H in this dataset.
Orderflow & CVD
-
4H CVD:
- Trend: Falling
- Net Delta: -$3,798,215
- Buy/Sell: 48.9% / 51.1%
- Divergence: Bearish (Price Up, CVD Down – Exhaustion)
-
1D CVD:
- Trend: Rising
- Net Delta: $263,360
- Buy/Sell: 49.7% / 50.3%
- Divergence: Bullish (Price Down, CVD Up – Absorption)
This shows short-term bearish and higher-timeframe bullish CVD divergences coexisting.
Open Interest & Funding
-
4H OI/Funding:
- OI Change (24h): -3.87%
- Latest Funding: 0.000042%
- Avg Funding: -0.000061%
- State: Neutral
- OI fluctuating around 155–156M.
-
1D OI/Funding:
- OI Change (24h): +7.41% (per dataset)
- Latest Funding: -0.000024%
- Avg Funding: -0.000061%
- State: Neutral
- OI around 154M after prior days near 165M.
Global Liquidations
- 17-02-26 16:05: $4.31M total, mostly shorts ($4.31M), led by BTC/USDT $3.73M.
- 17-02-26 14:40: $2.02M total, mostly longs ($2.01M), with BTC and ETH leading.
- 17-02-26 00:50: $1.14M total, mostly shorts ($1.14M), concentrated in SOL/USDT.
These peaks show alternating long and short liquidation clusters across major pairs.
5. Additional Structure: SMC, Divergences, and Technical Stats
-
Smart Money Concepts:
- FVG Resistance @ $0.17 (0.7%)
- No other SMC events.
-
Divergences:
- 4H OBV: Bearish divergence (15-02-26)
- 4H CVD: Bearish divergence
- 1D CVD: Bullish divergence
- 1D Divergences (other): No signals.
-
Technical Stats (4H highlights):
- ADX 30.34 (-2.71%), +DI 23.99 (+7.64%), -DI 16.22 (-9.41%) – moderate trend with stronger positive DI.
- CMF -0.08 (-15.59%) – more negative money flow.
- CCI -80.41 (+25.24%) – still negative but less so.
- Bollinger Bandwidth 0.10 (+2.04%) – slight widening.
-
Technical Stats (1D highlights):
- ADX 42.71 (-4.10%) – strong but easing trend.
- +DI 16.66 (-3.72%), -DI 24.48 (-0.46%) – downward DI remains higher.
- Volume -57.84% vs prior day – significantly lower activity.
- Bollinger Bandwidth 0.35 (-10.81%) – contracting daily volatility.
- CMF -0.03 (-19.98%) – more negative daily money flow.
- CCI -10.73 (from 6.01) – moved slightly below zero.
Bottom Line
The dataset describes XLM in a mixed, multi-timeframe environment:
- Macro: RISK OFF, bearish alt breadth and stablecoin pressure.
- Trend: 4H uptrend vs 1D downtrend, with price at $0.17 between $0.15–$0.16 support and $0.18–$0.20 resistance.
- Momentum & EMAs: Price clustered around short EMAs, well below long EMAs on daily.
- Orderflow: Bearish 4H CVD/OBV divergences vs bullish 1D CVD divergence.
- Correlation: Strong BTC linkage (0.80 correlation, beta 1.30).
No single dominant directional conclusion emerges from the data; instead, the picture is one of balanced but complex structure across timeframes and instruments.
⚠️ RISK WARNING & AI DISCLOSURE
- This information is generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and complex algorithms. While advanced, these systems can contain errors or inaccuracies and are for educational purposes only.
- Technical analysis provides no guarantees; this information is purely informative.
- All discussed scenarios are hypothetical and do not constitute predictions or expectations.
- Past performance is not an indicator of future results.
- This is not financial advice and is not intended as a call-to-action for the reader.
- No implicit direction is claimed, and no specific behavior of market participants is suggested.

